User talk:Diderot

Nothing so depressing as a blank page.

Old Talk:

Regarding ==Chinese Language==

Thank you very much for your reply Diderot, but I dont' understand what you mean by '...Chinese is muhc less unique...'. It's either a language, or a group of dialects, or via extention, a language family:S.

68.148.165.213 12:46, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Caught you!

Okay, if you're not this guy, how is it that you just happen to have edited this page? *Hmm*? —Steve Summit (talk) 15:13, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

iu.wp

Hi Didero,

as I've seen you are an admin on iu.wp. Could you delete the nonsense pages you can see on http://iu.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Recentchanges? Thanks in advance, Pill- 17:02, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. You wrote that you are no longer active on iu.wp really. Since the "unknown"-vandal is active tough, please could you give me sysop rights there? I will have a look on that wiki. Since my knowledge on Inuktitut is not that high (I know some grammar but no vocabulary and script) I can not contribute but, at least, I can revert and block open proxies (and such things). (Btw., not that you're wondering, Suisui gave me the rights only for some minutes to revert and block the IPs, I also blocked the main page to "autoconfirmed".) Greatings, --Thogo (Talk) 16:52, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. Just tell me how to? --Diderot 20:02, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You're bureaucrat there, so you have access to a special page iu:Special:Makesysop. It's still everything in English there, so't should be no problem. (Hope some day an Inuktitut speaker translates all these pages... :o) ) Grtx, --Thogo (Talk) 17:24, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It should be done now. --Diderot 20:54, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I've seen it. Thank you. :o) I will look well after the wiki. Grtx, --Thogo (Talk) 20:57, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

iu:User:Escarbot

Bonjour,

Peux-tu me dire ce qu'il faut faire pour obtenir le statut de robot sur iu: ?

Merci d'avance.

Vargenau 06:14, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ce qu'il faut faire? Aviser d'autres administrateurs sur :iu qui sont plus actifs. J'essaie de me dégager de toute responsibilité sur Wikipedia, vu que ma thèse m'occupe à plus ou moins 100%. --Diderot 06:26, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, you're the only available Bureaucrat on iu.wp, other sysops can't set bot flags. But I request Bot flag for Escarbot on Meta, that should work either. --Thogo (Talk) 09:00, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

J.-H. Rosny

Hi - in this article you said (two years ago!) that both brothers wrote Quest for fire, however according to this source [1] (a 1967 edition dust jacket) it was the older brother, and also the J.-H. Rosny article says after 1909 the brothers stopped working together and Quest for Fire was published in 1911. Do you have any sources or info to help clear up the contradictions? See also the talk page for Quest for Fire. Thanks! -- Stbalbach 15:57, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The French Wikipedia page says so. --Diderot 06:28, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Munich

I'm wondering if you would be interested in joining WikiProject Munich Kingjeff 01:41, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Article in need of cleanup - please assist if you can

The article Acetabulum, to which you have helped contribute, has been flagged as requiring cleanup.

If possible, we would appreciate your assistance in cleaning up this article to bring it up to Wikipedia's quality standards. If you are unsure what the nature of the problem is, please discuss this on the article's talk page.
If you do not want to receive bot-generated messages on your talk page, please consider using the nobots template on your user talk page

Olesia

Could you look at the syllabics on this article. They don't look right to me. Thanks. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 15:03, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I should have noticed the syllabics. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 21:09, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Logo cooks.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Logo cooks.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 02:45, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Culture & the internet [2]

Fantastic, mesmerising post... thank you for making my day. Anchoress 20:31, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're very welcome. I certainly enjoyed writing it more than writing the obnoxious little hashing function I was avoiding at the time. --Diderot 23:07, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mmm, that sounds interesting too. ;-) Anchoress 23:12, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your userpages

In Dutch page: 我是加拿大人，在比利时住。不好说荷兰语, 说很好法语和英语。我看中文一点。我翻译荷兰文的条目成英文和法文。

I suppose "不好说" means you don't speak it well. :) "不好说" here means "Don't speak Dutch" or "Not good to speak Dutch".

You may say: 我是加拿大人，在比利時住，荷蘭語說不好，說很好的法語和英語。我懂看一點中文。我翻譯荷蘭文的條目成英文和法文。

Note that 語 and 文, when used as names of languages, are the same, though 文 specifically refers to "text". Also, 荷蘭語說不好 may be put after "English". It's more natural to put less important things at the back.

In Chinese page: 你不知道荷兰语吗? 我也不好说。

I suppose you mean "You don't speak Dutch? I also don't". But how do you translate Dutch into others? :) --Fitzwilliam 16:15, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Butterball logo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Butterball logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 18:53, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Bartizan.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Bartizan.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 04:26, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Collected Cases of Injustice Rectified

Two years ago, you made these edits to this article, adding block quotations of Song Ci's writing without using inline citations to cite your sources properly with page number and author. Well, now it is coming back to haunt you. Lol. I am working on getting the article Society of the Song Dynasty up to Good Article status, and there is information about Song Ci in the article that is crucial to the article's success in passing. Since you were able to provide Song Ci's writing, I am presuming that you own McKnight's book that translates Song Ci's writing, and if this is so, I need you to properly cite those block quotes. Thank you, it actually means a lot if you could do this, I would be incredibly grateful.--PericlesofAthens 23:38, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bot bit iu:User:SieBot

Hi Diderot. A while ago I made a request for a bot bit to be set for iu:User:SieBot at iu:Wikipedia:Bots#Bot_bit_request_SieBot. Could you please set the bit? Thanks. Siebrand 09:30, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Banquet-logo.gif

Image Copyright problem

This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:Banquet-logo.gif. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:55, 12 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 13:55, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Big mama sausage.gif

Image Copyright problem

This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:Big mama sausage.gif. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:15, 12 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 17:15, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Blue Bonnet logo.jpg

Image Copyright problem

This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:Blue Bonnet logo.jpg. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:50, 12 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 19:50, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Wesson.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Wesson.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:18, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unified Canadian Aboriginal Syllabics character table

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Unified Canadian Aboriginal Syllabics character table, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Unified Canadian Aboriginal Syllabics character table. MCP9999 (talk) 23:21, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Emgann

Bonsoir.

Vous voudrez bien excuser cette intervention en français, je crois que vous préférez l'anglais. J'ai modifié dans l'article "Emgann la phrase soulignée.

Le procès de mars 2004 n'a (hélas!) rien éclairci sur l'Affaire de Quévert. Les quatre personnes poursuivies pour "complicité" , sans que personne ne soit poursuivi comme "auteur" matériel, ont été ACQUITTEES dans cette partie des poursuites et ont été condamnées pour d'autres faits. Le parquet a fait appel sur trois de ces acquittements, mais il demeure une sérieuse controverse de savoir si cet appel est régulier, et ce pour différentes raisons assez techniques. Toujours est-il qu'aucune date n'est fixée pour ce procès en appel.

|This theft was followed by a series of bombings attributed to the ARB, including a fatal explosion at a McDonald's in Quévert (Côtes-d'Armor). Ultimately, a former spokesman for Emgann was found guilty of conspiracy to commit terrorist acts for the bombings in Quévert and elsewhere. [3]

Vous pouvez me répondre ici ou me joindre sur ma page de discussion du Wiki en français.

Cordialement.

Claude Le Duigou —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.1.145.217 (talk) 21:06, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Bakers' queues

I have nominated Bakers' queues, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bakers' queues. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Guy (Help!) 12:02, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Andy Capp's Snacks logo.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Andy Capp's Snacks logo.gif. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 03:43, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Healthy Choice.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Healthy Choice.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 07:36, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:County line logo.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:County line logo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 09:29, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Chef Boyardee logo.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Chef Boyardee logo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 09:38, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Marie-calendars.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Marie-calendars.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 09:38, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Orville Redenbacher's logo.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Orville Redenbacher's logo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 09:38, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:HebrewNational.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:HebrewNational.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 09:38, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Logo eckrich.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Logo eckrich.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 11:07, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: Image:Creemap.png

Image:Creemap.png is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:Image:Crimapo.png. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[Image:Crimapo.png]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:47, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Hunts logo.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:Hunts logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Kalel2007 (talk) 18:50, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Frederic Henry Ambrose Scrivener

I looked to the history of edits in the article and found that you are responsible for this sentence: "He was an advocate of the Textus Receptus over more modern manuscripts as a source for Bible translations." It is not true. Scrivener was not supporter of the Textus Receptus, he was one of its major critics. Scrivener enumerated all differences between Erasmian editions, Stephanus (1550), Theodore Beze (1565), and Elzevier's editions (1624, 1633). Scrivened distinguished as the first the Textus Receptus from the Majority Text. Scrivener enumerated all errors of the Textus Receptus. See his monumental book "A Plain Introduction to the Criticism of the New Testament" (London 1894) two volumes. Why did you write "He was an advocate of the Textus Receptus"? Perhaps you took it from books of supporters of KJV. A lot of erros in these books, they are not reliable. Leszek Jańczuk (talk) 22:25, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Big Mama Sausage

The article Big Mama Sausage has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references failed to find significant coverage in reliable sources to comply with notability requirements. This included web searches for news coverage, books, and journals, which can be seen from the following links:
Big Mama Sausage – news, books, scholar
Consequently, this article is about a subject that appears to lack sufficient notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Abductive (reasoning) 07:19, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Diderot! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 5 of the articles that you created are Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to these articles, it would greatly help us with the current 198 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Martial Célestin - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Jean-Jacques Honorat - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Smarck Michel - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Rosny Smarth - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Jean Marie Chérestal - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:54, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merge

I have proposed to merge Apostille and Hague Convention Abolishing the Requirement of Legalisation for Foreign Public Documents. I noticed you seem to have started both of them on the same day in 2004. I cannot understand why two separate articles were started (unless redirects didn't exist back in 2004). Jc3s5h (talk) 13:49, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Microregion

The article Microregion has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Original research.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mootros (talk) 17:25, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Microregion for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Microregion is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Microregion until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Mootros (talk) 23:13, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dai Nagao

The article Dai Nagao has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NOTABLE. IMDB isn't a reliable source.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The Snowager-is awake 06:10, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:13, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pierre Bertin

The article Pierre Bertin has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Only one valid entry, with hatnotes to others

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 15:21, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of County Line (brand)

The article County Line (brand) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Un-notable cheese brand that has a dead link to its website. The company is very local and this article is unencyclopedic.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AmericanAir88 (talk) 17:35, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Banjari for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Banjari is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Banjari until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. » Shadowowl | talk 14:01, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Micro-region" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Micro-region has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 23 § Micro-region until a consensus is reached. ~T P W 15:03, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Yves Frémion

The article Yves Frémion has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Natg 19 (talk) 17:16, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Cook's Ham

The article Cook's Ham has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Run-of-the-mill brand of ham with no claim of ntability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]