Talk:Korean Unification Flag

Korea High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Heraldry and vexillology

Korean Unification Flag is within the scope of the Heraldry and vexillology WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of heraldry and vexillology. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Heraldry and vexillologyWikipedia:WikiProject Heraldry and vexillologyTemplate:WikiProject Heraldry and vexillologyheraldry and vexillology articles

It is requested that an image or photograph of the variation showing Socotra Rock/Ieodo be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
Wikipedians in Korea may be able to help!
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Untitled

Wasn't Korea unification flag the more appropriate title. Saying this, I'm not aware of any other Unification Flag, so maybe just leave it where it is. Kokiri 22:40, 15 Aug 2004 (UTC)

You mean Korean. - 69.212.70.138 19:54, 27 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

How about Unification Flag of Korea? --Puzzlet Chung 20:25, 27 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Unless there's some other "Unification Flag" with an article, I see no reason to move.--Pharos 21:50, 23 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I've removed this page's entry from Wikipedia:Requested moves due to a lack of consensus on the move. If this changes, feel free to add another request. --Lox (t,c) 21:36, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What, no Dokdo?

It's kind of hard to believe that the Unification Flag would leave out Ulleungdo and Dokdo! I really expected to see them there. --Reuben 04:38, 12 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Since the two Koreas recently agreed to place Ulleungdo and Dokdo to the Korean Unification Flag, we should replace the current flag, which does not display Dokdo and Ulleungdo with a flag which does. Tell me what you think. --DandanxD 10:20, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

By all means, any revamped flag needs to clearly display not only Dagelet and Liancourt Rocks just as clearly as it now shows Quelpart, but it should feature Socotra Rock so everybody will be happy and han-free. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.79.62.19 (talk) 09:14, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mount Baeteuk as well. Gando! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.7.15.166 (talk) 04:11, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It seems that originally Cheju was the only island included. Anything else would be rather inconspicuous on an actual cloth flag, if included according to strict scale... AnonMoos (talk) 11:33, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Official status

The article states that the flag isn't "the official" flag of either Korea (which is to be expected) -- what I wonder is if it has the status of a official flag? --Himasaram 13:21, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Only during special events but even then, it's not considered "official" (i.e. the Olympics). --DandanxD 10:35, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

German Flag

the german flag should not be pictured in this article, it should have a link in the see also section

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Korean Unification Flag. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:55, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

2018 Paralympics

Apparently North Korea refused to enter together with South Korea for the 2018 Paralympic opening ceremony, unless a version of the flag with Liancourt/Dokdo clould be used: [1] -- AnonMoos (talk) 14:13, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Primary purpose, origin and symbolism

Is this correct - that the primary purpose of the flag is to represent the two countries together in sporting events? I was under the impression that it's a flag of the overall Korean reunification movement (indeed, its use on Korean reunification implies this), and that any use in sporting events derives from this.

Furthermore, I'm made to wonder the origin of the design. Of course, the shape of the Korean peninsula isn't in itself designed, but some work must have gone into turning this into a flag design. Was this work done by a North Korean, a South Korean, a meeting of people of both nations or someone else entirely?

Moreover, the Symbolism section currently talks about how South Koreans view the flag and about how North Koreans view South Koreans' use of it. What about how North Koreans view it when used by their own people, and how South Koreans view its use by North Koreans? This is before you get to the matter of how it's viewed by the nations' governments versus by the people generally, and of different individuals having different views on the matter.

But clearly the intended symbolism is of (the prospect of) Korea as a unified country. Still, frequently in flags the colours symbolise something; can anyone shed light on this? — Smjg (talk) 16:12, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]